Hackathon Project · Gemini Multimodal Agent · 2026
An Agent That Assists Research Annotation of Aphasic Gesture & Speech
An autonomous agent concept, prototyped for a Gemini hackathon, that assists Speech-Language Pathologists in annotating co-speech gesture and aphasic speech from video — work directly informed by patterns I observed during my PhD fieldwork on inclusive data visualisation for people with aphasia, and by published literature on communication compensation strategies.
Problem
Manual Annotation Is a Bottleneck for Aphasia Research and Care
People with aphasia often compensate for word-finding difficulty through co-speech gesture — pantomiming an action, pointing to reference something spatially or temporally, or using conventionalised signs when a word won't come. Standard speech-to-text tools discard this entirely: phonetic paraphasias and anomic silences just register as noise, and the gestural half of the message is invisible to automated transcription altogether.
Speech-Language Therapists currently annotate this manually, tier by tier, in software like ELAN. From what I observed during my own PhD fieldwork with aphasia research participants, and consistent with what's documented in aphasia research literature, this manual process is extremely slow relative to the length of footage being coded — a real bottleneck that limits how much longitudinal patient data clinicians and researchers can realistically review.
Artifact 01 — Problem Statement
Problem Statement
This problem occurs in my current research context. I want to build an app that enable gesture and speech annotation from a video recording for people with aphasia. Currently this process is done by hand and normal speech to text transcription could not handle people with aphasia's speech and video needed to be annotated for meaningful gesture that convey intent that are not captured by speech.
Artifact 02 — System Design
Design Approach
Rather than a silent auto-labeller, I designed this agent around a collaborative-partner model: it does the first pass of multimodal annotation, but flags ambiguity and asks the clinician rather than guessing — directly responding to the trust concern above.
Artifact 03 — Study Plan (Not Yet Conducted)
Planned Validation
The hackathon build itself hasn't been clinically tested. Here's the study I'd run next to find out whether it actually helps — the deliverable is the plan, and I want to be upfront that none of this has been executed yet.
Status
Where This Stands
Honest snapshot of what's actually built versus what's still ahead.
Built for the hackathon
- Multimodal parsing pipeline classifying gesture against the McNeill taxonomy
- Clarifying-question interaction loop design
- Adaptive Lexicon memory concept and data model
- ELAN (.eaf) / CSV / SOAP note export scaffolding
Not yet done
- Any testing or validation with real SLPs or clinicians
- Accuracy benchmarking against expert gold-standard annotation
- Problem framing validated beyond literature + fieldwork
- Production-grade UI polish and accessibility pass